Thank you for the opportunity to celebrate the fortieth anniversary of the N.Y.U Review of Law & Social Change.
The Review played a significant role in both my law school experience and the work I have been doing since. N.Y.U. Law was my first choice for law school because I wanted to pursue public interest law, and, with its extensive clinical program and the Review, N.Y.U. provided the most opportunities to do so. I continue to recommend it as the law school for individuals interested in this area of law.
Journals like the Review obviously play a significant role in the practice of public interest law. They give support to legal arguments in litigation and move policy agendas along in vital ways. They give perspective to practitioners by identifying a problem; laying out legal and non-legal responses; providing rational, critique-oriented approaches; recommending future actions; and helping to correct approaches to legal problems that may be well-intentioned but lead to counterproductive results.
The subject of the article that I wrote as a student, The Case for Legal Remedies for Abused Women, provides an example of how journals like ours can aid in the development of good public policy. When I wrote my article, domestic violence was just being exposed as a social issue; previously, domestic violence had been shrouded in silence as a private family matter. The advocacy movement itself was also relatively new. By the mid-1970s, domestic violence was becoming a public issue as the media began writing about what was going on behind closed doors. Legislative change was also just beginning; in 1976, Pennsylvania became the first state to adopt a civil law applicable outside of the marital relationship.
On its 25th anniversary, teachers of the NYU School of Law Family Defense Clinic look back at the development of an innovative practice model that helped shape the burgeoning family defense movement. As the first law school clinic of its
Explores problems in the battered women's movement stemming from a lack of acknowledgment of race and class differences among battered women.
Victims of domestic violence should be able to participate in how domestic violence litigation is resolved in order to promote effective interventionist strategies to reduce victim re-abuse and lethality.
Do new domestic terrorism laws put Black Lives Matter supporters, anti-war protestors, and/or animal rights activists at risk? Do they presently incorporate sufficient safeguards against such misuse and abuse?