John V. Evans v. Jeff D. – Brief for Amici Curiae (Comm. of Legal Assistance in NY)
Introduction
INTEREST OF AMICUS
The Association of the Bar of the City of New York was incorporated by act of the New York Legislature in 1871. It was formed, in part, “for the purposes of… facilitating and improving the administration of justice, elevating the standard of integrity, honor and courtesy in the legal profession … .” Constitution, Article II. It is composed of over 14,000 lawyers and judges practicing or residing in the City of New York. This brief is filed on behalf of the Association’s Committee on Legal Assistance.
The interest of the Committee in this case is threefold. First, it seeks to encourage access to legal representation for all persons. It pursues this objective both by encouraging attorneys to undertake representation of indigents pro bono and by supporting the availability of statutory attorneys fees in civil rights cases. In the opinion of the Committee, negotiation tactics such as those apparently used in this case threaten substantially to undermine the availability of statutory fees in civil rights cases and, therefore, the availability of counsel to indigent civil rights claimants.
Suggested Reading
Montgomery v Louisiana: Providing Some Hope to Inmates
Stephen M. Nickelsburg, Adam C. Goldstein, Emily Maw, and Keith Nordyke∞ By ruling in January that “Miller announced a substantive rule that is retroactive,”[1] the Supreme Court ensured that individuals previously sentenced to mandatory life without parole for crimes
Amici Curiae Brief of New York Law School Professors in People v. Harris: Constitutionality of the New York Death Penalty Statute under the State Constitution's Cruel and Unusual Punishments and Antidiscrimination Clauses
Amici are teachers in New York law schools who have studied the operation of the death penalty for the purpose of teaching the subject, writing about it in scholarly journals, or representing persons accused or convicted of capital crimes. Most
Brief Amicus Curiae Of The National Center For Lesbian Rights; Lambda Legal Defense and Education Fund; Gay and Lesbian Advocates and Defenders; Center Kids; and Gay and Lesbian Parents Coalition International in Support of Respondent-Appellee
Although estoppel has not previously been applied when the "family that [the child] knows it to be" is a lesbian family, amici urge this court to uphold the trial court's application of the doctrine to protect children in planned lesbian