Attempted Regulation of Independent Group Speech
Introduction
Independent expenditures are defined under the Federal Election Campaign Act (FECA) as expenditures for communications that expressly advocate the election or defeat of a clearly identified candidate. To be independent, these expenditures must be made without prior consultation, suggestion, request, or coordination with the candidate on whose behalf these expenditures are made.3 Independent expenditures were the subject of much public comment in 1980 as a result of highly publicized activities in connection with senatorial races by certain political action committees, the most prominent of which was the National Conservative Political Action Committee (NCPAC). Early in the campaign NCPAC targeted certain liberal senators for defeat and then made substantial independent expenditures to advocate their defeat.
Suggested Reading
Don't Let Trump-- or Biden-- Distract from the Real Victims of the Espionage Act
During the First World War, the Espionage Act was overwhelmingly used for the prosecution of dissidents, the Black press, radical labor, and socialists.
#SayHerName: Racial Profiling and Police Violence Against Black Women
Andrea J. Ritchie{{Andrea J. Ritchie is a civil rights attorney who has led groundbreaking research, litigation, and advocacy efforts to challenge profiling, policing, and physical and sexual violence by law enforcement against women, girls and LGBTQ people of color for
Labor Law and the NLRB: Friend or Foe to Labor and Non-Union Workers?
Wilma B. Liebman{{Former Member and Chairman, National Labor Relations Board, 1997-2011; visiting distinguished scholar Rutgers University School of Management and Labor Relations 2015-17; adjunct faculty, NYU Law School, spring 2015 and 2016. This article is based on remarks at the
In Response to "From the Picket Line to the Courtroom: A Labor Organizing Privilege to Protect Workers" by Nicole Hallet
Moshe Z. Marvit{{Moshe Z. Marvit is a fellow at The Century Foundation where he focuses on labor and employment law and policy.}} For years now, many in the labor movement have seen the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) as a