Brown Is Not Brown and Educational Reform Is Not Reform If Integration Is Not a Goal
Introduction
In their article, A Public Laboratory Dewey Barely Imagined: The Emerging Model of School Governance and Legal Reform, James S. Liebman and Charles F. Sabel argue that the “new [educational] reform” is the “legitimate legatee” of the movement for the desegregation of our schools. This claim is dangerously false, drawing upon the foundational myth of standards-based reform-that impoverished students of color will necessarily benefit from it. While we acknowledge that the new reform has the capacity to minimize the achievement gap between whites and nonwhites, it fails to set as an explicit goal the true integration of our schools. Throughout their argument, the authors mischaracterize the nature of both the Civil Rights Movement, as well as the educational reform itself. In the end, their article is not about Brown, but is an apology for not being about it. Without a more complete and honest “interrogation of matters of race and equality” Brown will not be Brown, and educational reform will not be reform. After briefly exposing these weaknesses, we will call for a type of reform that remains true to Brown, transforming education and society in ways that necessarily surpass the authors’ tempered goals.
Suggested Reading
#SayHerName: Racial Profiling and Police Violence Against Black Women
Andrea J. Ritchie{{Andrea J. Ritchie is a civil rights attorney who has led groundbreaking research, litigation, and advocacy efforts to challenge profiling, policing, and physical and sexual violence by law enforcement against women, girls and LGBTQ people of color for
My Twenty-Twos: Mentoring the Young Men Emerging Community
The kid’s name was Lil’ Yo—well, that’s what all his little buddies called him—and immediately his presence snagged my attention.
Labor Law and the NLRB: Friend or Foe to Labor and Non-Union Workers?
Wilma B. Liebman{{Former Member and Chairman, National Labor Relations Board, 1997-2011; visiting distinguished scholar Rutgers University School of Management and Labor Relations 2015-17; adjunct faculty, NYU Law School, spring 2015 and 2016. This article is based on remarks at the
Prohibiting Young Adult Life Without Parole: Examining Diminished Capacity and Diminished Culpability
As with juveniles, young adults (18-24) experience a diminished capacity for cognitive processing because the PFC and EFs continue to develop into the mid-20’s. This diminished capacity of young adults must be taken into consideration when sentencing people in this age