Burying the Dead: The Case against Revival of Pre-Roe and Pre-Casey Abortion Statutes in a Post-Casey World
Introduction
On June 29, 1992, the United States Supreme Court handed down its opinion in Planned Parenthood v. Casey, a decision decried by both pro- and anti-choice forces as unsatisfactory and unworkable. The Court’s majority opinion, which upheld numerous restrictions on the abortion decision while “retain[ing] the outer shell”‘ of Roe v. Wade, was written by Justices O’Connor, Kennedy, and Souter; the remainder of the Court submitted a variety of differing opinions. The Casey decision failed to provide a clear and workable standard and instead created confusion, anger, and hope among proponents and opponents of choice such that the debate over the fate of Roe will continue.
The majority, while refusing to accept the Third Circuit’s reasoning that Roe was dead, did agree that the “undue burden” standard was appropriate, albeit redefined. Under Casey, most restrictions on pre-viability abortions will be upheld as long as they do not create an outright ban or impose a “substantial obstacle”; most post-viability restrictions and even bans will be permitted, provided there are exceptions for the life and health of the woman. Thus, the Casey decision gives broad latitude to the states to regulate abortion.
Suggested Reading
#SayHerName: Racial Profiling and Police Violence Against Black Women
Andrea J. Ritchie{{Andrea J. Ritchie is a civil rights attorney who has led groundbreaking research, litigation, and advocacy efforts to challenge profiling, policing, and physical and sexual violence by law enforcement against women, girls and LGBTQ people of color for
My Twenty-Twos: Mentoring the Young Men Emerging Community
The kid’s name was Lil’ Yo—well, that’s what all his little buddies called him—and immediately his presence snagged my attention.
Tuesday, November 26, 2019
I understood death to be an essential part of life, but understanding this fact still didn’t make the experience of losing someone dear any easier.
Labor Law and the NLRB: Friend or Foe to Labor and Non-Union Workers?
Wilma B. Liebman{{Former Member and Chairman, National Labor Relations Board, 1997-2011; visiting distinguished scholar Rutgers University School of Management and Labor Relations 2015-17; adjunct faculty, NYU Law School, spring 2015 and 2016. This article is based on remarks at the