Involuntary Sterilization: An Unconstitutional Menace to Minorities and the Poor
Introduction
Interference with the procreative processes, with or without the consent of the subject, has been prevalent for some time in the United States. Surgical sterilization has been used (1) therapeutically, to treat illness or disease, or as a necessary incident of childbirth; (2) punitively, where sterilization of criminals and sex offenders is authorized by statute; (3) eugenically, particularly in the first sixty years of this century. to purge the population of mental defectives and other persons possessing socially undesirable qualities thought to be inheritable; and (4) socioeconomically, in recent times, primarily as a birth control technique. With respect to the last two applications. recent years have seen a shift in emphasis (fostered by individuals, states and finally the Federal Government) from the use of sterilization as a eugenic device to a family planning method. This development has resulted all too frequently in abuse of the poor and minorities, and has given rise to public concern regarding governmental invasion of the otherwise inviolable rights of privacy, bodily integrity and procreativity. Notwithstanding their effects, purportedly voluntary birth control programs employing sterilization have been rationalized as a benefit to individual indigents (by restrict-ing family size, thereby augmenting upward mobility) and to society (by limiting the number of dependent children, thereby reducing the cost of welfare programs). This Note will examine the competing individual and social interests and the constitutional objections surrounding the current use of involuntary sterilization.
Briefly, the Note develops four avenues of attack on involuntary sterilization statutes and practices. First, the Note analyzes privacy-due process arguments, which focus on the facial validity of involuntary sterilization, in terms of it-hat it involves and how it is carried out, with an emphasis on the competing interests and factual (scientific) predicates for the employment of sterilization as a birth control device. Second, the discussion takes up equal protection-invidious discrimination arguments, which focus on the validity of coercive and involuntary sterilization statutes andpractices as applied, with respect to it’ho is affected. Third, the analysis turns to the validity of sterilization with respect to the thirteenth amendment, a perspective fromwhich it appears that certain sterilization practices create a permanently stigmatized caste of unfortunates and may in effect constitute a form of contemporary genocide. Finally, the Note traces the development of regulatory safeguards in federally assisted family planning programs employing sterilization to determine their adequacy in light of the preceding framework.
Suggested Reading
How Race-Selective and Sex-Selective Bans on Abortion Expose the Color-Coded Dimensions of the Right to Abortion and Deficiencies in Constitutional Protections for Women of Color
April Shaw∞ Abstract The Supreme Court’s analysis of the fundamental right to abortion as articulated in Planned Parenthood v. Casey fails to take into account how race operates to restrict women of color’s ability to exercise their right to an
To the Right to Intimacy and Beyond: A Constitutional Argument for the Right to Sex in Mental Health Facilities
Hannah Hicks∞ Abstract This article confronts the controversial topic of the sexuality of individuals who experience mental disability. Through idiosyncratic and punitive treatment of sexual activity, mental health institutions generally do not allow inpatients to exercise an acceptable degree of
Breaking the Law by Giving Birth: The War on Drugs, the War on Reproductive Rights, and the War on Women
Prosecuting women who carry pregnancies to term despite their drug addictions fails to further the states' goal of protecting fetal health, violates the Equal Protection rights of pregnant women, and is bad public policy.
Confronting a New Obstacle to Reproductive Choice: Encouraging the Development of RU-486 through Reform of Products Liability Law
Analysis of products liability litigation and its potential application and adjustments to deal with new contraceptive medication.