Juvenile Court Statutes--Are They Void for Vagueness?
"Incorrigible" children who have not committed a crime should either not be subject to punitive treatment or should not be tried in juvenile court.
The Review: Volume 4
Preview
Issue 1
featuring
- Juvenile Court Statutes--Are They Void for Vagueness?
- Judicial Intervention in the Conduct of Private Associations: Bases for the Emerging Trend of Judicial Activism
- Racial and Ethnic Quotas: The Tipping Phenomenon In Otero v. New York City Housing Authority
- City of Burbank v. Lockheed Air Terminal, Inc.: Federal Preemption of Aircraft Noise Regulation and the Future of Proprietary Restrictions
In Depth Reading
Volume 4 Issue 1
Racial and Ethnic Quotas: The Tipping Phenomenon In Otero v. New York City Housing Authority
Analyzes the tipping point phenomenon of racial segregation in the context of Otero v. NYCHA.
With the Best of Intentions: The Constitutionality of the Statutory Scheme for Voluntary Child-Care Agencies in New York
This Note will consider the question of the constitutionality under the fourteenth amendment of New York's statutory scheme for voluntary child-care agencies.
Judicial Intervention in the Conduct of Private Associations: Bases for the Emerging Trend of Judicial Activism
Explores the weakening of the doctrine of private associations and increasing constitutional restraints on private groups under the fourteenth amendment.
Volume 4 Issue 2
The National Environmental Policy Act of 1969: Toward a Substantive Standard of Review
Examines difficulties in meeting the procedural requirements of the NEPA and efforts to create and implement a substantive standard.
Book Reviews 4.2
Includes reviews of: Disorder in the Court: Report of the Association of the Bar of the City of New York, Special Committee on Courtroom Conduct, by Norman Dorsen and Leon Friedman (1973), The Limits of Corporate Responsibility, by Neil W.
Due Process for Children: A Right to Counsel in Custody Proceedings
Argues for children's rights to representation that advocates for their own preferences in all forms of custody proceedings.
United States v. Fuller: Just Compensation
Argues that United States v. Fuller inappropriately narrowed just compensation in eminent domain cases.