Is West Germany’s 1975 Abortion Decision a Solution to the American Abortion Debate: A Critique of Mary Ann Glendon and Donald Kommers
Introduction
Within the span of two years, the highest constitutional courts of twoWestern democracies reached almost diametrically opposed decisions on theissue of abortion. In 1973, the United States Supreme Court held in Roe v.Wade’ that the constitutional right to privacy first articulated in Griswoldv. Connecticut extended to the right to choose to have an abortion. Under Roe, the right to abortion was left unrestricted during the first three months of pregnancy. During the second trimester, until the point of viability, states could regulate abortion only to preserve the health of the woman.’ In the last trimester a state could prohibit abortion, although it was not required to do so.’ While several subsequent decisions have curtailed the broad abortion right articulated in Roe, most abortions remain legal in the United States.’
In contrast, the West German Federal Constitutional Court struck down legislation in 1975 because it failed to criminalize abortion in the first trimester. The court determined that the state has an affirmative duty to protect the life of the fetus and decided that this duty could be fulfilled best through the use of criminal sanctions. As a result, abortion became illegal in West Germany except in a set of special circumstances (or indications) set out in the law.
The existence of these two radically different decisions has spurred theinterest of a number of scholars.
Suggested Reading
Breaking the Law by Giving Birth: The War on Drugs, the War on Reproductive Rights, and the War on Women
Prosecuting women who carry pregnancies to term despite their drug addictions fails to further the states' goal of protecting fetal health, violates the Equal Protection rights of pregnant women, and is bad public policy.
Gestational Surrogacy: Unsettling State Parentage Law and Surrogacy Policy
Critical analysis of the rights of the surrogate gestator and the allied state policies that are applicable to these arrangements.
Losing the Negative Right of Privacy: Building Sexual and Reproductive Freedom
Sexual and reproductive freedoms are negative privacy rights that the law should protect from encroachment.
Religious Perspectives on the Abortion Decision: The Sacredness of Women's Lives, Morality and Values, and Social Justice
As a society, we can have a greater appreciation of the need for resources and services that help individuals deal with reproductive issues if we consider the abortion decision in a holistic context, closely related to all other aspects of
How Race-Selective and Sex-Selective Bans on Abortion Expose the Color-Coded Dimensions of the Right to Abortion and Deficiencies in Constitutional Protections for Women of Color
April Shaw∞ Abstract The Supreme Court’s analysis of the fundamental right to abortion as articulated in Planned Parenthood v. Casey fails to take into account how race operates to restrict women of color’s ability to exercise their right to an