Panel Discussion of Effective Assistance on the Assembly Line
AUDIENCE COMMENT: I am Paul Chevigny of the New York University School of Law faculty. Fifteen years ago in New York City, prior to Baldwin v. New York, I we had no jury trials for misdemeanor charges. As in Philadelphia, there were an enormous number of trials, and they were short, although not as short as the ones Professor Schulhofer described. Nevertheless, the guilty plea rate was still extremely high. I think it was over ninety percent even then, though not as high as it is now. The guilty plea rate was high, because courts placed a premium on a plea. For a great many judges, a guilty plea justified a shorter sentence. That attitude is still prevalent, and it is not unconstitutional. Accordingly, if the Philadelphia system is to work elsewhere, it will require folkways on the part of the bar and the judges which permit and encourage the use of bench trials as contrasted with pleas. In a system under as much bureaucratic and economic pressure as New York’s is, how can that happen? How do you envision pragmatically changing a system which has pressures towards pleas that the Philadelphia system apparently doesn’t have?
STEPHEN SCHULHOFER: You’ve put your finger on a very tough problem.The Philadelphia system grew up for reasons that are not fully understood. It simply happens to be part of the culture in Philadelphia that judges do not place pressure on defendants to choose bench trials rather than guilty pleas.There is systemic pressure to waive a jury, but as between a guilty plea and a bench trial, the judges do not attempt to establish a tacit sentencing differential that would create pressure.
Crafting a Public Defense Career: An Interview with Assistant Federal Defender Amanda David
Molly Lauterback This is the fourth in a series of interviews with attorneys who are pursuing social change through their work. This conversation took place between Molly Lauterback, an editor and board member of the N.Y.U. Review of Law &
Alternative Strategies for Public Defenders and Assigned Counsel
Discusses the history and background of public defense and the strategies used in advancing it's goals then presents alternative strategies.
Beyond Lawyering: How Holistic Representation Makes for Good Policy, Better Lawyers, and More Satisfied Clients
Zealous advocacy is not enough to combat the effects after a criminal sentence is served, and a holistic approach is necessary
Bolder Management for Public Defense: Leadership in Three Dimensions
Looks at public defense leadership in three dimensions from very specific and local to broad and global.