Policing Protest: Protecting Dissent and Preventing Violence through First and Fourth Amendment Law
Introduction
In 1999, clashes between police and protesters at the World Trade Organization
(WTO) meetings in Seattle made national news with images of tear gas
and smashed windows. Seattle police tried to maintain order by establishing
no-protest zones, forcefully dispersing protesters, and conducting mass arrests.
These law enforcement tactics were reminiscent of notorious police excesses
against protesters during the 1960s, when dogs and fire hoses were turned on
civil rights demonstrators in the South, and of the Chicago police’s attack against
demonstrators and bystanders alike during the 1968 Democratic Convention.
The Seattle events marked the beginning of the newest chapter of increasingly
harsh police responses to protesters.
Suggested Reading
#SayHerName: Racial Profiling and Police Violence Against Black Women
Andrea J. Ritchie{{Andrea J. Ritchie is a civil rights attorney who has led groundbreaking research, litigation, and advocacy efforts to challenge profiling, policing, and physical and sexual violence by law enforcement against women, girls and LGBTQ people of color for
My Twenty-Twos: Mentoring the Young Men Emerging Community
The kid’s name was Lil’ Yo—well, that’s what all his little buddies called him—and immediately his presence snagged my attention.
The Ongoing Nakba: Toward a Legal Framework for Palestine
If the international community takes its crimes seriously, then the discussion about the unfolding genocide in Gaza is not a matter of mere semantics.
Labor Law and the NLRB: Friend or Foe to Labor and Non-Union Workers?
Wilma B. Liebman{{Former Member and Chairman, National Labor Relations Board, 1997-2011; visiting distinguished scholar Rutgers University School of Management and Labor Relations 2015-17; adjunct faculty, NYU Law School, spring 2015 and 2016. This article is based on remarks at the