Planned Failure: California's Denial of Reunification Services to Parents with Mental Disabilities
California's reunification bypass law fails to accurately determine if a mentally disabled parent may use such services, and does more harm than good
featuring
featuring
featuring
California's reunification bypass law fails to accurately determine if a mentally disabled parent may use such services, and does more harm than good
A comprehensive analysis of police response to public protests requires the courts consider the interplay between the 1st and 4th amendment rights.
The changing role of race in police suspect descriptions especially post 9-11, and legal challenges to its use on 4th and 14th amendment grounds.
The impact of Demore v. Kim on immigration decisions, deportations, and procedural reform in Joseph hearings
Advocates should use existing medical protocols and legal doctrines to assist transgender adolescents in accessing necessary sex reassignment treatment.
Legal narratives, like the literary works of Derrick Bell on race, function as parables in providing new knowledge and insights, contributing to legal debates.
Compares efficacy of affirmative action and comparable worth as different strategies in advancing women's employment rights.
Disparities in the asthma epidemic fall along racial and socio-economic lines, and legal advocacy can play a crucial role in combatting the issue.
Distinguishes critical legal thought an an elaboration on critical legal studies in different contexts and is constituted by anxiety from challenging tradition.
Traditional legal education is alienating. Reform legal education to account for emotional, ethical, and practical implications of law in people's lives.
Calls for abolishment of Terry doctrine and advocates probable cause standard for police stops instead of reasonable suspicion.
Teaching from the left is urging students to engage in historical evolution of left thought deploying reason to improve human tradition.
A critical appreciation of Harry Clor's scholarship defending morals legislation and the censorship of pornography.
Argues the need for enforceable laws requiring commercial pornography providers to restrict children's access to pornography on the internet.
Responding to Koppelman's critique, Weinstein argues he failed to address whether obscenity doctrine is aligned with larger free speech jurisprudence.
Pornography has become central to our culture, in large part due to technological innovation, requiring us to reassess our approach to its legal regulation.