Policing Protest: Protecting Dissent and Preventing Violence through First and Fourth Amendment Law
A comprehensive analysis of police response to public protests requires the courts consider the interplay between the 1st and 4th amendment rights.
featuring
featuring
featuring
A comprehensive analysis of police response to public protests requires the courts consider the interplay between the 1st and 4th amendment rights.
The amorphous nature of the law-and-literature discipline contributes to its value, as demonstrated by the novel Native Son by Richard Wright.
The impact of Demore v. Kim on immigration decisions, deportations, and procedural reform in Joseph hearings
The changing role of race in police suspect descriptions especially post 9-11, and legal challenges to its use on 4th and 14th amendment grounds.
Advocates should use existing medical protocols and legal doctrines to assist transgender adolescents in accessing necessary sex reassignment treatment.
Disparities in the asthma epidemic fall along racial and socio-economic lines, and legal advocacy can play a crucial role in combatting the issue.
Compares efficacy of affirmative action and comparable worth as different strategies in advancing women's employment rights.
Legal narratives, like the literary works of Derrick Bell on race, function as parables in providing new knowledge and insights, contributing to legal debates.
Teaching from the left is urging students to engage in historical evolution of left thought deploying reason to improve human tradition.
Traditional legal education is alienating. Reform legal education to account for emotional, ethical, and practical implications of law in people's lives.
In the law school context, the Left can focus producing leftist policy alternatives, and helping students resist cooptation into the oppressive system.
Legal teaching has a limiting, centralizing, homogenizing tendency. Professors should not present techniques and doctrine as established truths.
A critical appreciation of Harry Clor's scholarship defending morals legislation and the censorship of pornography.
Responding to Koppelman's critique, Weinstein argues he failed to address whether obscenity doctrine is aligned with larger free speech jurisprudence.
Argues the need for enforceable laws requiring commercial pornography providers to restrict children's access to pornography on the internet.
The metaphor of "moral pollution" was used by the Supreme Court to refashion obscenity regulations as public interest regulations.