The impact of Demore v. Kim on immigration decisions, deportations, and procedural reform in Joseph hearings
- Policing Protest: Protecting Dissent and Preventing Violence through First and Fourth Amendment Law
- Planned Failure: California's Denial of Reunification Services to Parents with Mental Disabilities
- Detaining Due Process: The Need for Procedural Reform in Joseph Hearings after Demore v. Kim
- Trial of Bigger Thomas: Race, Gender, and Trespass, The
- Derrick Bell's Narratives as Parables
- Asthma Crisis in Low-Income Communities of Color: Using the Law as a Tool for Promoting Public Health, The
- Toward Gender Equality: Affirmative Action, Comparable Worth, and the Women's Movement
- Doctor Won't See You Now: Rights of Transgender Adolescents to Sex Reassignment Treatment, The
In Depth Reading
Volume 31 Issue 1
A comprehensive analysis of police response to public protests requires the courts consider the interplay between the 1st and 4th amendment rights
The changing role of race in police suspect descriptions especially post 9-11, and legal challenges to its use on 4th and 14th amendment grounds
California's reunification bypass law fails to accurately determine if a mentally disabled parent may use such services, and does more harm than good
Volume 31 Issue 2
Legal narratives, like the literary works of Derrick Bell on race, function as parables in providing new knowledge and insights, contributing to legal debates
Advocates should use existing medical protocols and legal doctrines to assist transgender adolescents in accessing necessary sex reassignment treatment
Disparaties in the Asthma epidemic fall along racial and socio-economic lines, and legal advocacy can play a crucial role in combatting the issue
Compares efficacy of affirmative action and comparable worth as different strategies in advancing women's employment rights. Concludes they were complementary.
Volume 31 Issue 3
Recounts author's experience of reshaping his contracts class around discussing a custodial workers' strike at the school that was happening at the time
Interprets the contrasting view of critical legal education of two previous authors (Schlag and Gearey) as representing two faces of the left's confusion
Calls for abolishment of Terry doctrine and advocates probable cause standard for police stops instead of reasonable suspicion
Traditional legal education is alienating. Reform legal education to account for emotional,ethical, and practical implications of law in people's lives
Volume 31 Issue 4
The metaphor of "moral pollution" was used by the Supreme Court to refashion obscenity regulations as public interest regulations.
Overview of the origins of modern obscenity laws.
Argues the need for enforceable laws requiring commercial pornography providers to restrict children's access to pornography on the internet.
Responding to Koppelman's critique, Weinstein argues he failed to address whether obscenity doctrine is aligned with larger free speech jurisprudence.