Possessing Pollution
Introduction
On April 22, 1957, government attorney Roger Fisher appeared before the Supreme Court in defense of the federal obscenity statute, which criminalizes the distribution of obscene materials through the mails. Although the power of the federal and state governments to regulate obscenity had been assumed for nearly 170 years, Second Circuit Judge Jerome Frank’s concurrence in United States v. Roth had critically appraised the precarious historical, jurisprudential, and sociological foundation on which this presumption rested. Judge Frank concluded that although he was bound to uphold Samuel Roth’s conviction as a member of an inferior court, the Supreme Court’s “clear and present danger” precedent strongly implied the unconstitutionality of the federal obscenity statute.
Suggested Reading
#SayHerName: Racial Profiling and Police Violence Against Black Women
Andrea J. Ritchie{{Andrea J. Ritchie is a civil rights attorney who has led groundbreaking research, litigation, and advocacy efforts to challenge profiling, policing, and physical and sexual violence by law enforcement against women, girls and LGBTQ people of color for
My Twenty-Twos: Mentoring the Young Men Emerging Community
The kid’s name was Lil’ Yo—well, that’s what all his little buddies called him—and immediately his presence snagged my attention.
Conservative Progressivism in Immigrant Habeas Court: Why Boumediene v. Bush is the Baseline Constitutional Minimum
Ever since Boumediene was decided federal judges have not applied the full force of all six of Boumediene’s holdings to immigrant habeas cases, and as a direct result immigration advocates lost their most important cases to date.
Tuesday, November 26, 2019
I understood death to be an essential part of life, but understanding this fact still didn’t make the experience of losing someone dear any easier.