Response to Institutional Litigation in the Post-Chapman World
Response to panel and paper entitled Institutional Litigation in the Post-Chapman World.
featuring
featuring
Response to panel and paper entitled Institutional Litigation in the Post-Chapman World.
Discussion on panel, paper and responses on institutional responses to overcrowding.
Discussion led by Graham Hughes on the Question of Appropriate Sentences: Responding to Prison Overcrowding Through Sentencing Policy.
Discussion of the impact of Rhodes v. Chapman, 452 U.S. 337 (1981) on Eighth Amendment litigation of prison conditions.
Examines ways the law can ensure democratic governance in the internal affairs of unions
Tracks the development of selective incapacitation as an alternative sentencing procedure; argues for rejection because its impossible to predict dangerousness.
The male sexual impulse is a means for courts to find that men and women are not similarly situated; application of this principle in different areas of the law.
Reflections by a Family Court Judge on modern psychotherapy's ideas of child welfare and the social and psychological consequences of their overuse
Discussion of the impact on child welfare law and policy of seminal works arguing for less state intervention in removing children from functional families.
Analysis of child welfare legal frameworks and their failure to incorporate non-nuclear family kinship structures and cultural nuances
Responses by professor of child welfare and family law related to the role that the law should play in affecting family bonds and child placement