Throughout the development of the public education system in this country, the Supreme Court, Congress, and the American majority have supported the power and right of the public schools to serve a socialization function.
Replacing the constitutionally mandated requirement of probable cause with a reasonableness standard subject to wide interpretation is especially dangerous where aright as fundamental as privacy is at stake.
From society's standpoint it is important to preserve not only Native religious property, but also the irreplaceable Native beliefs and practices associated with that property.
This policy of deterrence violates domestic and international law and it should be curtailed. Only by eliminating the detention policy will the human rights of refugees and other aliens be vindicated.
Some feminist theorists and most judicial decisions obscure the duality between the law's treatment of the employment rights of the majority and the minority of women.
Modern decisions document that defendants are frequently subjected to multiple prosecutions that are neither reviewed by executive authority nor subject to judicial review.
Other Issues in this Volume
- Panel Discussion of Response to Divided Loyalties: Musings on Some Ethical Dilemmas for the Institutional Criminal Defense Attorney
- Panel Discussion on Systemic Challenges and Strategies for Reform to the Public Defender System
- Preface -- Effective Assistance of Counsel for the Indigent Criminal Defendant: Has the Promise Been Fulfilled
- Bench Trials, Adversariness, and Plea Bargaining: A Comment on Schulhofers's Plan
- Promoting Settlement, Foregoing the Facts
- Current Proposals in Congress to Limit and to Bar Court-Awarded Attorney's Fees in Public Interest Litigation
- Alternative Dispute Resolution and International Trade
- John V. Evans v. Jeff D. - Brief for Amici Curiae (NAACP, Lawyers Comm. for Civil Rights, ACLU, NY Legal Aid Society)