Doctored Rights: Menstrual Extraction, Self-Help Gynecological Care, and the Law
Introduction
For many, whether the right is the physician’s or the woman’s is of no practical consequence. The campaign for legal abortion has always been pre- mised on the still largely unquestioned assumption that only legal abortions are safe abortions because they are performed by physicians, who are licensed (and therefore presumably skilled), rather than by the notorious “back-alley abortionists” (who are presumably untrained and unskilled). For many people, to imagine abortions performed by nonphysicians is to conjure nightmares of bloody coat hangers, turpentine or lye ingestion, and other “home remedies” leading to injury and even death.’ Thus, while pro-choice advocates have repeatedly challenged almost every other restriction that state and federal governments have attempted to place on the performance of abortions, physician requirements have never provoked the same aggressive litigation and advocacy. In fact, in cases like Menillo, where a state prosecuted a non- physician for performing an unauthorized abortion, pro-choice legal organizations have shown an uncharacteristic silence on the issue.”
Suggested Reading
The Whole Woman’s Health v. Hellerstedt Oral Argument: A Roundtable Discussion with Members of NYU Law Students for Reproductive Justice
Photo Courtesy of Juliana Morgan‑Trostle Introduction On June 27, 2016, the Supreme Court decided Whole Woman’s Health v. Hellerstedt,[1] a case referred to as “the most significant abortion case to come before the court since 1992.”[2] The case centered
Abortion and Women's Legal Personhood in Germany: A Contribution to the Feminist Theory of the State
Review and analysis of abortion law in pre and post unified Germany.
Abortion: A Public Health and Social Policy Perspective
Much of what passes as concern for the fetus is in truth the punitive reaction of those who perceive abortion as an instrument of left-wing ideology; their anti-abortion stance is simply a smokescreen enabling them to vent their antagonism for
Burying the Dead: The Case against Revival of Pre-Roe and Pre-Casey Abortion Statutes in a Post-Casey World
Discusses the problem of Casey and the confusion and ambiguity it has caused and argues against the revival of pre-Casey criminal abortion statutes.
“Beyond Rational Belief”: Evaluating Health-Justified Abortion Restrictions After Whole Woman’s Health
This article analyzes the medical evidence (or lack thereof) behind "health-justified" abortion regulations, and argues that such restrictions fail to meet the evidence-based standard of Whole Woman’s Health.
Comparison of the Availability of Contraceptive Methods in Selected European Countries and the United States
Comparison of pharmaceutical and non-drug forms of contraceptives.
Is West Germany's 1975 Abortion Decision a Solution to the American Abortion Debate: A Critique of Mary Ann Glendon and Donald Kommers
Discusses regulation of abortion in West Germany as it applies to America as well as the reasons why it should not apply.
Hospital Mergers and the Threat to Women's Reproductive Health Services: Applying the Antitrust Laws
Suggests that the antitrust laws provide an important set oftools for those concerned about the impact of a hospital merger on repro-ductive health services.