Panel Discussion: Effects of Violent Pornography
Introduction
SYLVIA LAW: We have six panelists here today: four feminists and two lawyers. I guess my function is to bridge the gap. (Laughter.) We are going to begin hearing from the two feminists who did not speak this morning. Phyllis Chesler is a psychologist and the author of several books including Women and Madness, and Florence Rush is a social worker and a therapist who specializes in the problem of sexual abuse in children. Then we are going to hear a response to their statements from Paul Chevigny, who is a former NYCLU lawyer, a novelist, and a professor at this law school, and David Richards, who is a prolific writer on such subjects as law and morality and particularly moral issues that relate to sex, and is also a professor in this law school. Then Andrea Dworkin and Leah Fritz, whom you heard this morning, will respond to them. Then we are going to open it up to an exchange among the panel, and finally, we will open it up for questions and comments from the floor.
OPENING STATEMENT OF FLORENCE RUSH: We do not have a history of a taboo against the sexual use of children. Until recently, children were a paternal property and could be legitimately exploited, sold, or even killed by their masters. And since minors were also a sexual property, sex between male adults and children has been sanctioned, or at the very least tolerated, in our institutions of marriage, concubinage, slavery, prostitution, and pornography.
Today we expect the adult world to protect the young from sexual exploitation, but because we have neglected to simultaneously deprive men of their sexual privileges, our prohibitions represent the same confusion as do all laws and attitudes which arise from a double standard. Recently I heard a woman protest the marriage between a man of twenty and a woman of thirty. “‘The bride is a cradle snatcher,” she said. When the protester was reminded of a male friend of seventy who was living with a woman of thirty, she spontaneously approved with “Good for John. I’m glad the old boy still has it in him.” This common approbation of sex between young females and older males is also reflected in the law. In 1962, the American Law Institute recommended that the legal age of consent to sex (now between sixteen and eighteen, depending upon the state) be uniformly dropped to age ten. And until the legal age of consent in the state of Delaware was changed in 1972, if a man of forty had sex with a child of seven or over, he did so legally.
Suggested Reading
#SayHerName: Racial Profiling and Police Violence Against Black Women
Andrea J. Ritchie{{Andrea J. Ritchie is a civil rights attorney who has led groundbreaking research, litigation, and advocacy efforts to challenge profiling, policing, and physical and sexual violence by law enforcement against women, girls and LGBTQ people of color for
My Twenty-Twos: Mentoring the Young Men Emerging Community
The kid’s name was Lil’ Yo—well, that’s what all his little buddies called him—and immediately his presence snagged my attention.
Tuesday, November 26, 2019
I understood death to be an essential part of life, but understanding this fact still didn’t make the experience of losing someone dear any easier.
Labor Law and the NLRB: Friend or Foe to Labor and Non-Union Workers?
Wilma B. Liebman{{Former Member and Chairman, National Labor Relations Board, 1997-2011; visiting distinguished scholar Rutgers University School of Management and Labor Relations 2015-17; adjunct faculty, NYU Law School, spring 2015 and 2016. This article is based on remarks at the