The Role and Consequences of the Death Penalty in American Politics
Introduction
As we enter the last decade of the twentieth century, the death penalty has become a prominent issue in a wide range of American political campaigns. Along with other symbolic issues, such as the pledge of allegiance and the furlough of Willie Horton, President George Bush and his advisors made the death penalty a central issue in the 1988 presidential race. One of the most memorable (and damaging) questions of the campaign was raised by Cable News Network (CNN) correspondent Bernard Shaw during the second debate between candidates Bush and Michael Dukakis, when Shaw provided a dramatic opening to the debate by asking Dukakis whether his opposition to the death penalty would be swayed if someone raped and murdered his wife.
In retrospect, there is no question that focusing on the candidates’ differences on the death penalty was an effective political strategy for the Republican Party. But does it benefit the nation’s citizens when politicians campaigning for state or national office make advocacy of the death penalty centerpieces of their campaigns? It can have such an effect only if the death penalty addresses a fairly widespread social problem and there is simultaneously sufficient reason to believe the death penalty is an effective and practical tool for reducing the problem’s occurrence.
We begin this Article by estimating the frequency of crimes potentially subject to the death penalty compared to the frequency of non-capital crimes, particularly those which are considered violent. We then examine what isknown about the death penalty’s relative effectiveness in reducing the frequency of criminal homicide. We use the results from these two inquiries as a framework for examining the role of capital punishment in American politics at the state and national level, as well as examining how and why politicians use the death penalty to manipulate the crime issue. Finally, we argue that debates surrounding capital punishment generate misinformation that restricts the public’s ability to make informed judgments about public policy, and undermines its faith in the political system.
Suggested Reading
Campaign Finance Reforms: Past Accomplishments, Future Challenges
The campaign reforms of the 1970's have done much to improve this nation's campaign financing system. It is essential that we complete the cycle of campaign finance reform begun in the 1970's if our governmental institutions are to move beyond
A Decade of Election Law Reform
Remarks on campaign finance reforms of the 1970s, Buckly v. Valeo, growth of political action committees.
On Metaphors, Mirrors, and Murders: Theodore Bundy and the Rule of Law
Article discusses the Ted Bundy case and debunks myths about Ted Budy receiving super due process and his attorneys caused delays in executing his sentence.
Data & the Death Penalty: Exploring the Question of National Consensus Against Executing Emerging Adults in Conversation with Andrew Michaels’s A Decent Proposal: Exempting Eighteen‑ to Twenty‑Year‑Olds From the Death Penalty
Brian Eschels I. National Consensus Through Practice II. Where Do Courts Look For National Sentencing Statistics? III. Possible Sources of Offender Age Data IV. Clark Prosecutor Data V. Trends in the Execution of Emerging Adults In A Decent Proposal: Exempting