Introduction
Judges, practitioners, and law professors should collaborate to improve the justice system.
featuring
featuring
featuring
featuring
Judges, practitioners, and law professors should collaborate to improve the justice system.
Discussion of the benefits and challenges of a community based public defense system then looks at a case study. Concerns are also addressed.
Public defense's public perception and ability to be effective and reduce crime in communities.
A history of the US and Israeli public defense systems and a comparison between the two.
A discussion of several policy and social issues within the adoption and foster care systems and their effects on these systems and the children within them.
Argues that the educational tax exemption regime raises risks of arbitrary and discriminatory enforcement and offers a mask of objectivity.
Discusses monogamy and its alternatives. Imagines how law is used to encourage people to express monogamy as a preference.
Discusses ineffective assistance of counsel cases; argues that courts need to define instances when the court's integrity is implicated.
Explores the vocabulary used in the war on terror and how it reflects the indecision of the executive branch on what to call terrorism suspects.
Brief of Amicus Curiae Fred Korematsu who challenged the constitutionality of Japanese internment.
Reviews pre and post 9/11 terrorism legislation and tensions between the three branches of government in grappling with threats to national security.
Compares Japanese Internment with post 9/11 programs targeting Muslims such as the Absconder Apprehension Initiative and explores its constitutionality.
Explores the absence of state-sanctioned barriers to educational access in Latin American, segregation in Brazil and the rhetorical value of Brown v. Board.
Examines the ideological underpinnings of the Civil Rights Movement and questions whether these principles form a viable framework for shaping today's advocacy.
2004 NYU Review of Law and Social Change Colloquium, Keynote Address
Argues that the Court must confront the reality of inner-city crime in its search and seizure jurisprudence and take into account crime statistics.