Bolder Management for Public Defense: Leadership in Three Dimensions
Looks at public defense leadership in three dimensions from very specific and local to broad and global.
featuring
featuring
featuring
featuring
Looks at public defense leadership in three dimensions from very specific and local to broad and global.
Advice to policy makers about how to educate themselves to create effecive policy regarding the criminal defense system.
Discussion of the benefits and challenges of a community based public defense system then looks at a case study. Concerns are also addressed.
Judges, practitioners, and law professors should collaborate to improve the justice system.
Discusses monogamy and its alternatives. Imagines how law is used to encourage people to express monogamy as a preference.
Argues that the educational tax exemption regime raises risks of arbitrary and discriminatory enforcement and offers a mask of objectivity.
A discussion of several policy and social issues within the adoption and foster care systems and their effects on these systems and the children within them.
Discusses ineffective assistance of counsel cases; argues that courts need to define instances when the court's integrity is implicated.
Compares Japanese Internment with post 9/11 programs targeting Muslims such as the Absconder Apprehension Initiative and explores its constitutionality.
Explores the role of judges during war and the balancing of the risk of government overreach against the risk of enforcing certain constitutional rights.
Explores the vocabulary used in the war on terror and how it reflects the indecision of the executive branch on what to call terrorism suspects.
Brief of Amicus Curiae Fred Korematsu who challenged the constitutionality of Japanese internment.
2004 NYU Review of Law and Social Change Colloquium, Keynote Address
Argues that the Court must confront the reality of inner-city crime in its search and seizure jurisprudence and take into account crime statistics.
Examines the ideological underpinnings of the Civil Rights Movement and questions whether these principles form a viable framework for shaping today's advocacy.
Explores the absence of state-sanctioned barriers to educational access in Latin American, segregation in Brazil and the rhetorical value of Brown v. Board.