Explores the vocabulary used in the war on terror and how it reflects the indecision of the executive branch on what to call terrorism suspects.
Brief of Amicus Curiae Fred Korematsu who challenged the constitutionality of Japanese internment.
Explores the role of judges during war and the balancing of the risk of government overreach against the risk of enforcing certain constitutional rights.
Compares Japanese Internment with post 9/11 programs targeting Muslims such as the Absconder Apprehension Initiative and explores its constitutionality.
Reviews pre and post 9/11 terrorism legislation and tensions between the three branches of government in grappling with threats to national security.
Other Issues in this Volume
- Alternative Strategies for Public Defenders and Assigned Counsel
- From Day One: Who's in Control as Problem Solving and Client-Centered Sentencing Take Center Stage
- Keeping Gideon's Promise: A Comparison of the American and Israeli Public Defender Experiences
- What Policy-Makers Need to Know to Improve Indigent Defense Systems
- The Subordination of Subsidized Guardianship in Child Welfare Proceedings
- Flunking the Methodology Test: A Flawed Tax-Exemption Standard for Educational Organizations That Advocate a Particular Position or Viewpoint
- Protecting the Integrity of the Court: Trial Court Responsibility for Preventing Ineffective Assistance of Counsel in Criminal Cases
- Monogamy's Law: Compulsory Monogamy and Polyamorous Existence
- Fifty Years after Brown, the Civil Rights Ideology and Today's Movement
- To Be Brown in Brazil: Education and Segregation Latin American Style
- Officer or Overseer: Why Police Desegregation Fails as an Adequate Solution to Racist, Oppressive, and Violent Policing in Black Communities
- Relearning Brown: Applying the Lessons of Brown to the Challenges of the Twenty-First Century