Judging Remorse
This study uses interviews with judges to examine the role of remorse in judicial decisionmaking.
featuring
featuring
featuring
featuring
This study uses interviews with judges to examine the role of remorse in judicial decisionmaking.
The regulation of pregnant women in medical research and FDA labeling has created a system in which they and their fetuses are unprotected from drug risks.
A transgender student's expression of her gender identity, including through the use of gender consistent bathrooms, is First Amendment protected speech,
This article argues Allyene signals a shift in the availability of constitutional challenges in cases where sentencing factors are particularly important.
Currently, the tax code disincentivizes dual income marriages. Congress should create a secondary earner tax deduction to reduce the tax code's gender bias.
DOJ guidance for mentally impaired detainees in immigration removal proceedings should be amended to provide counsel at earlier signs of incompetence.
Model legislation drafted by the American Legislative Exchange Council would effectively repeal the private enforcement of state consumer protection statutes.
Voting rights advocates should explore section 11(b) of the Voting Rights Act as a vehicle to combat voter intimidation.
Black americans whose ancestors were slaves are less likely to receive affirmative action than "Black multiracials" and "Black Immigrants."
The Court's Equal Protection jurisprudence adopts a false equivalency between discrimination against oppressed minorities and against white people.
Affirmative action policies are harmed by institutional obsession with rankings, which incentivizes prioritizing high scores over diversity.
Affirmative action advocates should trade race-conscious affirmative action for race-neutral disadavantages that disporportionately affecting people of color.
A reparations suit for african americans based on the common law trust relationship is supported by reparations litigation for american indians.
An evidentiary privilege to protect workers' confidential communications from disclosure in federal and state court proceedings would support unions.
Brooks Emanuel∞ Abstract This article argues that because of the North Carolina Supreme Court’s failure to perform its statutorily mandated comparative proportionality review of all death sentences, North Carolina’s imposition of the death penalty violates the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments
Non-profit boards should be more attentive to resource constraints when implementing governance best practices.