Racial and Ethnic Quotas: The Tipping Phenomenon In Otero v. New York City Housing Authority
Analyzes the tipping point phenomenon of racial segregation in the context of Otero v. NYCHA.
The Review: Volume 4
Preview
Issue 1
featuring
- Racial and Ethnic Quotas: The Tipping Phenomenon In Otero v. New York City Housing Authority
- Judicial Intervention in the Conduct of Private Associations: Bases for the Emerging Trend of Judicial Activism
- City of Burbank v. Lockheed Air Terminal, Inc.: Federal Preemption of Aircraft Noise Regulation and the Future of Proprietary Restrictions
- Juvenile Court Statutes--Are They Void for Vagueness?
Issue 2
featuring
- Chambers v. Mississippi: The Limits of Due Process--The "Voucher Rule" and the Exception for Hearsay Declarations against Interest
- United States v. Fuller: Just Compensation
- Kaimowitz v. Department of Mental Health: Involuntary Mental Patient Cannot Give Informed Consent to Experimental Psychosurgery
- Book Reviews 4.2
In Depth Reading
Volume 4 Issue 1
Judicial Intervention in the Conduct of Private Associations: Bases for the Emerging Trend of Judicial Activism
Explores the weakening of the doctrine of private associations and increasing constitutional restraints on private groups under the fourteenth amendment.
With the Best of Intentions: The Constitutionality of the Statutory Scheme for Voluntary Child-Care Agencies in New York
This Note will consider the question of the constitutionality under the fourteenth amendment of New York's statutory scheme for voluntary child-care agencies.
Juvenile Court Statutes--Are They Void for Vagueness?
"Incorrigible" children who have not committed a crime should either not be subject to punitive treatment or should not be tried in juvenile court.
Volume 4 Issue 2
Chambers v. Mississippi: The Limits of Due Process--The "Voucher Rule" and the Exception for Hearsay Declarations against Interest
Examines the Supreme Court's application of due process in Chambers v. Mississippi and the confrontation clause issues present in the case.
Involuntary Sterilization: An Unconstitutional Menace to Minorities and the Poor
Scrutinizes the legitimacy of involuntary sterilization on Constitutional grounds and explores the issue of consent in sterilization regulations.
United States v. Fuller: Just Compensation
Argues that United States v. Fuller inappropriately narrowed just compensation in eminent domain cases.
Kaimowitz v. Department of Mental Health: Involuntary Mental Patient Cannot Give Informed Consent to Experimental Psychosurgery
Explores the issue of consent and constitutional concerns in experimental psychosurgery, as weighed against state interests and medical progress.