... it is what judges failed to do, as opposed to what they actually did, that is Dyzenhaus's ultimate focus.
- Bias before the Law: The Rearticulation of Hate Crimes in Wisconsin v. Mitchell
- The Virtue in Discretion: Ethics, Justice, and Why Judges Must Be Students of the Soul
- Listening to Foster Children in Accordance with the Law: The Failure to Serve Children in State Care
- Book Review: Judging the Judges, Judging Ourselves
- Developing Cooperatives as a Job Creation Strategy for Low-Income Workers
- The Color-Blind Constitution, Civil Rights-Talk, and a Multicultural Discourse for a Post-Reparations World
- The Right to Appointed Counsel on Prosecution Appeals: Hard Realities and Theoretical Perspectives
- Expedited Removal at U.S. Borders: A World without a Constitution
- Book Review: Crying Wolf or a Dying Canary?
- Lack of Uniformity in the Deportation of Criminal Aliens
- Creating a Causal Connection: From Prenatal Drug Use to Imminent Harm
- Welfare Reform and the Administration for Children's Services: Subjecting Children and Families to Poverty and Then Punishing Them for it
- Standing and Delivering on Title VII's Promises: White Employees' Ability to Sue Employers for Discrimination against Nonwhites
- Human Experimentation and the Double Facelessness of a Merciless Epoch
- Bad News Should Travel Fast: Hot Checks, Tardy Banks, and the Uniform Commercial Code's Rude Surprise
- The New Class Action Jurisprudence and Public Interest Law
In Depth Reading
Volume 25 Issue 1
Examining how hate crime statutes play out in the law and interact with popular discourse
Arguing that children in the foster care system should be given a voice in determining policy and using survey results to show a desire for permanency
Looking at judicial decision making through Aristolean and neoAristolean theories of virtue ethics
Volume 25 Issue 2
How worker-owned cooperative businesses can be used as an effective job creation strategy for lowincome workers.
Robson forges a new kind of legal thinking: one that takes advantage of what Gayatri Spivak has called "strategic essentialism" for use in a "scrupulously delineated political interest," one that remains wary of the dangers of an essentialism that is
Arguing that plenary power doctrine can no longer be justified and the Court can find the expedited removal procedure in violation of the Fifth Amendment.
Argument for a legal framework for analyzing appointment of counsel on prosecution appeals that is predicated on a theory of equal representation.
Volume 25 Issue 3
Highlights the problems implicit in reconciling statutory neglect provisions with judicial findings of neglect involving cocaine-exposed infants.
Professor Schuck, in his book, Citizens, Strangers, and In-Betweens-- a collection of mostly previously published work-- has crafted an extended argument that such fears are at best marginal and insignificant and at worst dangerous.
Arguing the convergence of benefit termination and the pursuit of child welfare cases will be detrimental to families by pushing greater numbers into poverty.
Examines federal deportation law with respect to criminal aliens, focusing on the interaction between federal immigration law and state criminal law.
Volume 25 Issue 4
Explores some of the ways in which the human face serves as both a marker of moral value and a call of moral duty.
Article detailing how to use new class action jusrisprudence in the public interest context.
Exposes the inequity of tardy charge-back on behalf of consumers who cannot afford to challenge it in thecourts.
Attempts to reinvigorate the strategy of having white plaintiffs bring Title VII suits for unlawful employment practices against racial minorities.