Robson forges a new kind of legal thinking: one that takes advantage of what Gayatri Spivak has called "strategic essentialism" for use in a "scrupulously delineated political interest," one that remains wary of the dangers of an essentialism that is
Argument for a legal framework for analyzing appointment of counsel on prosecution appeals that is predicated on a theory of equal representation.
Arguing that plenary power doctrine can no longer be justified and the Court can find the expedited removal procedure in violation of the Fifth Amendment.
How worker-owned cooperative businesses can be used as an effective job creation strategy for lowincome workers.
Arguing that civil rights talk and legal change based in reparations should give way to multiultural discourse, building on affirmative action
Other Issues in this Volume
- Listening to Foster Children in Accordance with the Law: The Failure to Serve Children in State Care
- Book Review: Judging the Judges, Judging Ourselves
- Bias before the Law: The Rearticulation of Hate Crimes in Wisconsin v. Mitchell
- The Virtue in Discretion: Ethics, Justice, and Why Judges Must Be Students of the Soul
- Welfare Reform and the Administration for Children's Services: Subjecting Children and Families to Poverty and Then Punishing Them for it
- Book Review: Crying Wolf or a Dying Canary?
- Creating a Causal Connection: From Prenatal Drug Use to Imminent Harm
- Lack of Uniformity in the Deportation of Criminal Aliens
- The New Class Action Jurisprudence and Public Interest Law
- Bad News Should Travel Fast: Hot Checks, Tardy Banks, and the Uniform Commercial Code's Rude Surprise
- Human Experimentation and the Double Facelessness of a Merciless Epoch
- Standing and Delivering on Title VII's Promises: White Employees' Ability to Sue Employers for Discrimination against Nonwhites