Detaining Due Process: The Need for Procedural Reform in "Joseph" Hearings after Demore v. Kim
The impact of Demore v. Kim on immigration decisions, deportations, and procedural reform in Joseph hearings
featuring
featuring
featuring
featuring
The impact of Demore v. Kim on immigration decisions, deportations, and procedural reform in Joseph hearings
The changing role of race in police suspect descriptions especially post 9-11, and legal challenges to its use on 4th and 14th amendment grounds.
A comprehensive analysis of police response to public protests requires the courts consider the interplay between the 1st and 4th amendment rights.
California's reunification bypass law fails to accurately determine if a mentally disabled parent may use such services, and does more harm than good
Compares efficacy of affirmative action and comparable worth as different strategies in advancing women's employment rights.
Legal narratives, like the literary works of Derrick Bell on race, function as parables in providing new knowledge and insights, contributing to legal debates.
Disparities in the asthma epidemic fall along racial and socio-economic lines, and legal advocacy can play a crucial role in combatting the issue.
Advocates should use existing medical protocols and legal doctrines to assist transgender adolescents in accessing necessary sex reassignment treatment.
Depoliticized legal education is disconnected from politicized reality. Leftist education must help students be critical thinkers to enable institutional change.
In the law school context, the Left can focus producing leftist policy alternatives, and helping students resist cooptation into the oppressive system.
Truth commissions seek to overcome limitations with criminal system by giving victims a public voice, but in fact merely shift narrative power to transcriber.
Teaching from the left is urging students to engage in historical evolution of left thought deploying reason to improve human tradition.
Examines the impact of Ashcroft v. Free Speech Coalition on child pornography laws and reviews empirical research on pornography and its effects.
Responding to Koppelman's critique, Weinstein argues he failed to address whether obscenity doctrine is aligned with larger free speech jurisprudence.
Overview of the origins of modern obscenity laws.
A critical appreciation of Harry Clor's scholarship defending morals legislation and the censorship of pornography.