Detaining Due Process: The Need for Procedural Reform in "Joseph" Hearings after Demore v. Kim
The impact of Demore v. Kim on immigration decisions, deportations, and procedural reform in Joseph hearings
featuring
featuring
featuring
The impact of Demore v. Kim on immigration decisions, deportations, and procedural reform in Joseph hearings
California's reunification bypass law fails to accurately determine if a mentally disabled parent may use such services, and does more harm than good
The amorphous nature of the law-and-literature discipline contributes to its value, as demonstrated by the novel Native Son by Richard Wright.
A comprehensive analysis of police response to public protests requires the courts consider the interplay between the 1st and 4th amendment rights.
Advocates should use existing medical protocols and legal doctrines to assist transgender adolescents in accessing necessary sex reassignment treatment.
Compares efficacy of affirmative action and comparable worth as different strategies in advancing women's employment rights.
Disparities in the asthma epidemic fall along racial and socio-economic lines, and legal advocacy can play a crucial role in combatting the issue.
Legal narratives, like the literary works of Derrick Bell on race, function as parables in providing new knowledge and insights, contributing to legal debates.
A meditation on the transference of trauma within the legal system.
Teaching tools of self-reflection is essential to creating a program of teaching from the left in the field of property and heritage law.
Legal teaching has a limiting, centralizing, homogenizing tendency. Professors should not present techniques and doctrine as established truths.
When teaching international economic law it is essential to address "common sense" notions and how they inform students' ideas and approaches.
Responding to Koppelman's critique, Weinstein argues he failed to address whether obscenity doctrine is aligned with larger free speech jurisprudence.
The metaphor of "moral pollution" was used by the Supreme Court to refashion obscenity regulations as public interest regulations.
A critical appreciation of Harry Clor's scholarship defending morals legislation and the censorship of pornography.
Pornography has become central to our culture, in large part due to technological innovation, requiring us to reassess our approach to its legal regulation.