Introduction
The papers which follow grew out of a one-day conference entitled “The Supreme Court and Daily Life: Who Will the Court Protect in the 1990’s?” which was held on October 21, 1989. This event, co-sponsored by The Nation Institute and The
featuring
featuring
featuring
featuring
The papers which follow grew out of a one-day conference entitled “The Supreme Court and Daily Life: Who Will the Court Protect in the 1990’s?” which was held on October 21, 1989. This event, co-sponsored by The Nation Institute and The
Sexual and reproductive freedoms are negative privacy rights that the law should protect from encroachment.
Discussion of the increasingly difficulty of lititgating employment discrimination cases in light of new Court decisions.
Argues that protections erected by the Supreme Court shielding the press from defamation actions should be imported to the contract setting.
Exploration of reasons for and possible explanations regarding the growing public support for the death penalty.
Examination of the of the increasing time limitations on death row inmate's ability to file habease corpus petitions.
Discussion regarding the inadequacy of counsel provided to defendants i capital cases.
Overview of reasons for choosing the death penalty as the subject of the colloquium.
Data analysis of various habeas procedures and doctrines through looking at habeas cases in SDNY in a three year period.
The death penalty has become a prominent issue in a wide range of American political campaigns.
Looking at Hauptmann and Bigelow capital punishment cases to explore how our system is still fallible and how innocents can be sentenced to death.
Data shows decisions to charge and sentence defendants to death are not based on legally relevant factors; explores relevancy of factors in Texas cases.
Discussion of if current law impedes forming public policy around the ability of the wealthy to pay higher taxes by allowing secrecy around income tax returns.
Discussion of the intersection of race and contract theory/contract formalism.
Examining Rawls' theory of justice through a feminist lens, and particularly how it fails to deal with sexism in a sexual/marital contract between men & women.
Discussion around the idea of family as kin and more modern conceptions of family and how it has become strongly politicized.