The Supreme Court and Daily Life: Who Will the Court Protect in the 1990s--Introduction
Introduction to the Articles in this issue, pertaining to a wide vareity of civil liberties and rights the Court will address in its upcoming term and beyond.
featuring
featuring
featuring
featuring
Introduction to the Articles in this issue, pertaining to a wide vareity of civil liberties and rights the Court will address in its upcoming term and beyond.
Sexual and reproductive freedoms are negative privacy rights that the law should protect from encroachment.
Discussion of the increasingly difficulty of lititgating employment discrimination cases in light of new Court decisions.
The papers which follow grew out of a one-day conference entitled “The Supreme Court and Daily Life: Who Will the Court Protect in the 1990’s?” which was held on October 21, 1989. This event, co-sponsored by The Nation Institute and The
Discussion regarding the inadequacy of counsel provided to defendants i capital cases.
Examination of the declining use of executive clemency in capital cases.
Overview of reasons for choosing the death penalty as the subject of the colloquium.
Examines parameters within which defense counsel can argue that a prosecutor's closing statement establishes grounds for reversing a death sentence.
High number of those given death penalty not many executed, reflecting state uncertainty around death penalty; looking at data to support this conclusion.
A cataloguing of wrongful convictions in NY over a 20 year period, supporting position that NY should not reenact death penalty.
Effects of implementing FIDSA and how it can be used to combat racism in death sentencing cases.
Supreme Court hasn't examined fairness in death penalty cases and reduced obstacles to its use; abolitionists need legislative and political strategies.
Analyzing the social security review system which is subject to political influences and conflicting law, and suggesting reforms.
Examining Rawls' theory of justice through a feminist lens, and particularly how it fails to deal with sexism in a sexual/marital contract between men & women.
Discussion of if current law impedes forming public policy around the ability of the wealthy to pay higher taxes by allowing secrecy around income tax returns.
Discussion around the idea of family as kin and more modern conceptions of family and how it has become strongly politicized.