Limiting the Right to a Bias-Free Workplace: A Survey of the Employment Discrimination Decisions of the 1988-89 Term
Discussion of the increasingly difficulty of lititgating employment discrimination cases in light of new Court decisions.
featuring
featuring
featuring
featuring
Discussion of the increasingly difficulty of lititgating employment discrimination cases in light of new Court decisions.
The papers which follow grew out of a one-day conference entitled “The Supreme Court and Daily Life: Who Will the Court Protect in the 1990’s?” which was held on October 21, 1989. This event, co-sponsored by The Nation Institute and The
Examination of increasing challenges to affirmative action in the context of an increasingly conservative judiciary.
Comparing and contrasting Contractarian and Feminist arguments regarding the validity of legal prostituion.
Examination of if Teague and its exceptions continue to protect the innocent defendant as do the rules pertaining to abuse of the writ and procedural default.
Argues the necessity of public education and exposure of capital trials in order to educate the public regarding the injustice of the death penalty.
Discussion of the scope and availability of habeas corpus defenses to capital case defendants in light of recent Supreme Court decisions.
Overview of reasons for choosing the death penalty as the subject of the colloquium.
The death penalty has become a prominent issue in a wide range of American political campaigns.
Effects of implementing FIDSA and how it can be used to combat racism in death sentencing cases.
Article discusses the Ted Bundy case and debunks myths about Ted Budy receiving super due process and his attorneys caused delays in executing his sentence.
Impact of Teague's limits on habeas corpus jurisdiction and the Teague nonretroactivity doctrine.
Analyzing the social security review system which is subject to political influences and conflicting law, and suggesting reforms.
Discussion of the intersection of race and contract theory/contract formalism.
Discussion of if current law impedes forming public policy around the ability of the wealthy to pay higher taxes by allowing secrecy around income tax returns.
Examining Rawls' theory of justice through a feminist lens, and particularly how it fails to deal with sexism in a sexual/marital contract between men & women.