The papers which follow grew out of a one-day conference entitled “The Supreme Court and Daily Life: Who Will the Court Protect in the 1990’s?” which was held on October 21, 1989. This event, co-sponsored by The Nation Institute and The
Argues that protections erected by the Supreme Court shielding the press from defamation actions should be imported to the contract setting.
Introduction to the Articles in this issue, pertaining to a wide vareity of civil liberties and rights the Court will address in its upcoming term and beyond.
Analyzing constitutional validity of requiring broadcasters to provide free advertising time to political candidates.
Analysis of the racial bias of the death penalty andr access to post-conviction appellate review for death-row prisoners.
Sexual and reproductive freedoms are negative privacy rights that the law should protect from encroachment.
Discussion of the increasingly difficulty of lititgating employment discrimination cases in light of new Court decisions.
Comparing and contrasting Contractarian and Feminist arguments regarding the validity of legal prostituion.
Analysis of products liability litigation and its potential application and adjustments to deal with new contraceptive medication.
The Supreme Court's decisions last term have eroded the protections afforded in the Bill of Rights, and looking forward it seems the trend will continue.
Examination of increasing challenges to affirmative action in the context of an increasingly conservative judiciary.
Other Issues in this Volume
- Innocence, Federalism, and the Capital Jury: Two Legislative Proposals for Evaluating Post-Trial Evidence of Innocence in Death Penalty Cases
- The Chiropractor as Brain Surgeon: Defense Lawyering in Capital Cases
- Suspending Justice: The Unconstitutionality of the Proposed Six-Month Time Limit on the Filing of Habeas Corpus Petitions by State Death Row Inmates
- Ambivalence in State Capital Punishment Policy: An Empirical Sounding
- Prosecutorial and Jury Decision-Making in Post-Furman Texas Capital Cases
- On Metaphors, Mirrors, and Murders: Theodore Bundy and the Rule of Law
- More Than Slightly Retro: The Rehnquist Court's Rout of Habeas Corpus Jurisdiction in Teague v. Lane
- Woman Behind the Blindfold: Toward a Feminist Reconstruction of Rawls' Theory of Justice, The
- Mending the Safety Net's Safety Net: The Federal Courts Study Committee's Proposals for Reforming the Social Security Disability Benefits Review Process
- Tax Glasnost for Millionaires: Peeking behind the Veil of Ignorance along the Publicity-Privacy Continuum
- A Family Like any Other Family: Alternative Methods of Defining Family in Law