The Bill for Rights: State and Local Financing of Public Education and Indigent Defense
Discussion of the battle to shift financing of public education and indigent defense from local entities to states.
featuring
featuring
featuring
Discussion of the battle to shift financing of public education and indigent defense from local entities to states.
Analysis of sex segregated schools in light of equality/antisegregation principles and positive from an intersectional perspective.
Critical analysis of state vs. local control over land use policies and regulations, favoring greater state control, using New Jersey as an example.
Application of the international terrorism-based Preemption Doctrine to domestic violence, arguing that battered women should be able to act in anticipatory self-defense.
Trial judges should have an increased role in identifying potentially false confessions before they get to the jury.
States should use parens patriae power to assist children living in poverty, instead of using it only when children are removed from their families.
Women are disproportionately affected by workplace weight discrimination, and the correlation with sex is strong enough for weight to be covered by Title VII.
The Supreme Court's decision in Hoffman does not require states to deny workers compensation benefits to undocumented immigrants.
For most in the United States, discussion of international human rights law brings to mind situations such as Abu Ghraib, the use of child soldiers in Africa, or the practices of the Taliban with regard to women. These egregious civil
Inward-looking ocal and state legislation can improve human rights in the US despite the federal government not executing the ICESCR.
Standarized testing infringes on the human right to education, especially for English language learner and minority children.
The US Constitution and principles of federalism require US courts to consider international law when making decisions that touch on human rights.
This is introductory material introduces the role of the prosecutor in combatting the harsh effects of the collateral consequences of a criminal sentence.
The consequences of a guilty plea or conviction in New York for immigrants are unforgiving and severe
Zealous advocacy is not enough to combat the effects after a criminal sentence is served, and a holistic approach is necessary
These pages represent a dream come true: a collaboration across the spectrum of our marvelous profession on a subject that advances the work of each group. Without question, each of us is better able to serve the public when we