Critical analysis of state vs. local control over land use policies and regulations, favoring greater state control, using New Jersey as an example.
- Single-Sex Schools and the Antisegregation Principle
- Implementing Planned Development: The Case of New Jersey
- While Dangers Gather: The Bush Preemption Doctrine, Battered Women, Imminence, and Anticipatory Self-Defense
- The Bill for Rights: State and Local Financing of Public Education and Indigent Defense
- Probative Weight: Rethinking Evidentiary Standards in Title VII Sex Discrimination Cases
- The Neglectful Parens Patriae: Using Child Protective Laws to Defend the Safety Net
- The Reality of False Confessions - Lessons of the Central Park Jogger Case
- Immigrant Workers and Workers' Compensation after Hoffman Plastic Compounds, Inc. v. N.L.R.B.
- Testing Human Rights: The Impact of High-Stakes Tests on English Language Learners' Right to Education in New York City
- Foreword-Realizing Domestic Social Justice Through International Human Rights
- More than an Incidental Effect on Foreign Affairs: Implementation of Human Rights by State and Local Governments
- Advocating for the Human Right to Housing: Notes from the United States
In Depth Reading
Volume 30 Issue 1
Analysis of sex segregated schools in light of equality/antisegregation principles and positive from an intersectional perspective.
Discussion of the battle to shift financing of public education and indigent defense from local entities to states.
Application of the international terrorism-based Preemption Doctrine to domestic violence, arguing that battered women should be able to act in anticipatory self-defense.
Volume 30 Issue 2
Women are disproportionately affected by workplace weight discrimination, and the correlation with sex is strong enough for weight to be covered by Title VII.
States should use parens patriae power to assist children living in poverty, instead of using it only when children are removed from their families.
Trial judges should have an increased role in identifying potentially false confessions before they get to the jury.
The Supreme Court's decision in Hoffman does not require states to deny workers compensation benefits to undocumented immigrants.
Volume 30 Issue 3
The US Constitution and principles of federalism require US courts to consider international law when making decisions that touch on human rights.
By focusing on human rights advocacy, dometic problems of inadequate housing and homelessness can be improved.
For most in the United States, discussion of international human rights law brings to mind situations such as Abu Ghraib, the use of child soldiers in Africa, or the practices of the Taliban with regard to women. These egregious civil
Standarized testing infringes on the human right to education, especially for English language learner and minority children.
Volume 30 Issue 4
JUDGE ROBERT G. M. KEATING: As Dean of the Judicial Institute, I would like to welcome you today to the Partners in Justice colloquium. I think it’s obvious from the program and from the website that an enormous amount of
Comprehensive litigation on the state level is necessary to dismantle the crippling barriers on criminals' reentry into society.
These pages represent a dream come true: a collaboration across the spectrum of our marvelous profession on a subject that advances the work of each group. Without question, each of us is better able to serve the public when we
Federal housing law, the collateral consequences of eviction following drug activity, and the procedures tenants must pursue to remain