Analysis of sex segregated schools in light of equality/antisegregation principles and positive from an intersectional perspective.
- Single-Sex Schools and the Antisegregation Principle
- Implementing Planned Development: The Case of New Jersey
- While Dangers Gather: The Bush Preemption Doctrine, Battered Women, Imminence, and Anticipatory Self-Defense
- The Bill for Rights: State and Local Financing of Public Education and Indigent Defense
- Probative Weight: Rethinking Evidentiary Standards in Title VII Sex Discrimination Cases
- The Neglectful Parens Patriae: Using Child Protective Laws to Defend the Safety Net
- Immigrant Workers and Workers' Compensation after Hoffman Plastic Compounds, Inc. v. N.L.R.B.
- The Reality of False Confessions - Lessons of the Central Park Jogger Case
- Advocating for the Human Right to Housing: Notes from the United States
- Foreword-Realizing Domestic Social Justice Through International Human Rights
- More than an Incidental Effect on Foreign Affairs: Implementation of Human Rights by State and Local Governments
- The Spirit of Our Times: State Constitutions and International Human Rights
In Depth Reading
Volume 30 Issue 1
Application of the international terrorism-based Preemption Doctrine to domestic violence, arguing that battered women should be able to act in anticipatory self-defense.
Discussion of the battle to shift financing of public education and indigent defense from local entities to states.
Critical analysis of state vs. local control over land use policies and regulations, favoring greater state control, using New Jersey as an example.
Volume 30 Issue 2
The Supreme Court's decision in Hoffman does not require states to deny workers compensation benefits to undocumented immigrants.
Women are disproportionately affected by workplace weight discrimination, and the correlation with sex is strong enough for weight to be covered by Title VII.
States should use parens patriae power to assist children living in poverty, instead of using it only when children are removed from their families.
Trial judges should have an increased role in identifying potentially false confessions before they get to the jury.
Volume 30 Issue 3
By focusing on human rights advocacy, dometic problems of inadequate housing and homelessness can be improved.
Standarized testing infringes on the human right to education, especially for English language learner and minority children.
The US Constitution and principles of federalism require US courts to consider international law when making decisions that touch on human rights.
Inward-looking ocal and state legislation can improve human rights in the US despite the federal government not executing the ICESCR.
Volume 30 Issue 4
Although holistic advocacy may greatly enhance a public defender’s practice, it has practical, professional, and ethical limitations as an institutional model
To ensure equal justice for all, the right to counsel should extend to matters in the civil context
This document is the agenda for the Partners in Justice event.
Zealous advocacy is not enough to combat the effects after a criminal sentence is served, and a holistic approach is necessary