Analysis of sex segregated schools in light of equality/antisegregation principles and positive from an intersectional perspective.
- Single-Sex Schools and the Antisegregation Principle
- While Dangers Gather: The Bush Preemption Doctrine, Battered Women, Imminence, and Anticipatory Self-Defense
- Bill for Rights: State and Local Financing of Public Education and Indigent Defense, The
- Implementing Planned Development: The Case of New Jersey
- Probative Weight: Rethinking Evidentiary Standards in Title VII Sex Discrimination Cases
- Immigrant Workers and Workers' Compensation after Hoffman Plastic Compounds, Inc. v. N.L.R.B.
- Reality of False Confessions - Lessons of the Central Park Jogger Case, The
- Neglectful Parens Patriae: Using Child Protective Laws to Defend the Safety Net, The
- More than an Incidental Effect on Foreign Affairs: Implementation of Human Rights by State and Local Governments
- Testing Human Rights: The Impact of High-Stakes Tests on English Language Learners' Right to Education in New York City
- Advocating for the Human Right to Housing: Notes from the United States
- Spirit of Our Times: State Constitutions and International Human Rights, The
In Depth Reading
Volume 30 Issue 1
Application of the international terrorism-based Preemption Doctrine to domestic violence, arguing that battered women should be able to act in anticipatory self-defense.
Discussion of the battle to shift financing of public education and indigent defense from local entities to states.
Critical analysis of state vs. local control over land use policies and regulations, favoring greater state control, using New Jersey as an example.
Volume 30 Issue 2
Women are disproportionately affected by workplace weight discrimination, and the correlation with sex is strong enough for weight to be covered by Title VII.
Trial judges should have an increased role in identifying potentially false confessions before they get to the jury.
The Supreme Court's decision in Hoffman does not require states to deny workers compensation benefits to undocumented immigrants.
States should use parens patriae power to assist children living in poverty, instead of using it only when children are removed from their families.
Volume 30 Issue 3
By focusing on human rights advocacy, dometic problems of inadequate housing and homelessness can be improved.
The US Constitution and principles of federalism require US courts to consider international law when making decisions that touch on human rights.
Inward-looking ocal and state legislation can improve human rights in the US despite the federal government not executing the ICESCR.
Standarized testing infringes on the human right to education, especially for English language learner and minority children.
Volume 30 Issue 4
This document is the agenda for the Partners in Justice event.
The consequences of a guilty plea or conviction in New York for immigrants are unforgiving and severe
The collateral consequences of a New York conviction: econmic obligations, impact on federal sentences, restrictions on those convicted of sex-related crimes
Unbundled legal services may help answer the unmet legal needs of poor New Yorkers; law school clinics can be used to test the efficacy of such representation