Critical analysis of state vs. local control over land use policies and regulations, favoring greater state control, using New Jersey as an example.
- Single-Sex Schools and the Antisegregation Principle
- The Bill for Rights: State and Local Financing of Public Education and Indigent Defense
- While Dangers Gather: The Bush Preemption Doctrine, Battered Women, Imminence, and Anticipatory Self-Defense
- Implementing Planned Development: The Case of New Jersey
- The Neglectful Parens Patriae: Using Child Protective Laws to Defend the Safety Net
- Probative Weight: Rethinking Evidentiary Standards in Title VII Sex Discrimination Cases
- The Reality of False Confessions - Lessons of the Central Park Jogger Case
- Immigrant Workers and Workers' Compensation after Hoffman Plastic Compounds, Inc. v. N.L.R.B.
- Testing Human Rights: The Impact of High-Stakes Tests on English Language Learners' Right to Education in New York City
- Foreword-Realizing Domestic Social Justice Through International Human Rights
- More than an Incidental Effect on Foreign Affairs: Implementation of Human Rights by State and Local Governments
- The Spirit of Our Times: State Constitutions and International Human Rights
In Depth Reading
Volume 30 Issue 1
Analysis of sex segregated schools in light of equality/antisegregation principles and positive from an intersectional perspective.
Application of the international terrorism-based Preemption Doctrine to domestic violence, arguing that battered women should be able to act in anticipatory self-defense.
Discussion of the battle to shift financing of public education and indigent defense from local entities to states.
Volume 30 Issue 2
Women are disproportionately affected by workplace weight discrimination, and the correlation with sex is strong enough for weight to be covered by Title VII.
States should use parens patriae power to assist children living in poverty, instead of using it only when children are removed from their families.
The Supreme Court's decision in Hoffman does not require states to deny workers compensation benefits to undocumented immigrants.
Trial judges should have an increased role in identifying potentially false confessions before they get to the jury.
Volume 30 Issue 3
By focusing on human rights advocacy, dometic problems of inadequate housing and homelessness can be improved.
Standarized testing infringes on the human right to education, especially for English language learner and minority children.
For most in the United States, discussion of international human rights law brings to mind situations such as Abu Ghraib, the use of child soldiers in Africa, or the practices of the Taliban with regard to women. These egregious civil
The US Constitution and principles of federalism require US courts to consider international law when making decisions that touch on human rights.
Volume 30 Issue 4
The collateral consequences of a New York conviction: econmic obligations, impact on federal sentences, restrictions on those convicted of sex-related crimes
Zealous advocacy is not enough to combat the effects after a criminal sentence is served, and a holistic approach is necessary
JUDGE ROBERT G. M. KEATING: As Dean of the Judicial Institute, I would like to welcome you today to the Partners in Justice colloquium. I think it’s obvious from the program and from the website that an enormous amount of
This document is the agenda for the Partners in Justice event.